In-Vehicle Cell Phone Use - Assessing Accident Risk

Mobile phone use in motor vehicles has increased at amotor vehicle. In light of the ongoing research for,
remarkable rate over the past 15 years. Yet it isand by, the National Highway Traffic Safety
undeniable that utilizing a cell phone while driving canAdministration ( we should at least consider their
affect driver performance as it relates to the overallpolicy on using cell phones while driving that states
safe operation of a vehicle. There are a number of"The primary responsibility of the driver is to operate
things to consider in deciding whether the trade off ina motor vehicle safely. The task of driving requires
convenience is worth the potential risks associatedfull attention and focus. Cell phone use can distract
with the distraction created by a cell phone. Givendrivers from this task, risking harm to themselves
the fact that the individual driver (and/or businessand others. Therefore, the safest course of action is
owner) ultimately pays for the resultingto refrain from using a cell phone while
consequences associated with an auto or truckdriving."Source: Cellular Telecommunications & Internet
accident (financial, emotional and physical lose); it isAssociation (CTIA)According to the CTIA, there are
prudent to seek out relevant and reliable informationcurrently more than 218 million subscribed cell phone
in making a decision. In doing so, consider the source,users as of August 2006 (compared to some 4.3
as well as the possible motivation behind themillion in 1990). Based on the extraordinary growth of
information provider.Source: US LegislationIn thecellular phone industry and the CTIA's advisory role, it
United States, there are currently no federal lawsmay be of value to think about their point of view
prohibiting driving while using a cell phone. In anon this topic. In doing so, you might consider a
earnest attempt to find a solution, some states (Newdocument found on the CTIA's web site, entitled
Jersey, New York, the District of Columbia,"SafeDrivingTalkingPoints2" (created June 6, 2006)
Connecticut and pending in California) have passedthat states "But for some reason, legislative efforts
laws barring hand-held cell phone use while driving.to prevent driver distractions have been narrowly
Typical fines range from $50 to $100 for driversfocused on wireless phone use. According to
caught using a hand-held device. While thesegovernment statistics and respected research
lawmakers have the public's best interest at heart bystudies, this approach is well off point." Consider that,
levying fines, not all entities weighing in on thisthere are more than 220 million vehicles on the road
subject are likely to have the same incentive.Source:and a similar number of cell phones subscribers. Based
Manufacturer ResearchAs the result of anon the amount of time customers might potentially
independent study (found on their web site in thespend using their cell phones in vehicles, we would
form of a press release), Plantronics, a manufacturerhope to find the CTIA an objective source. Given the
of headsets states, "71% of drivers steer moremagnitude of the revenue at stake, is a greater
accurately when using a headset with a mobiledegree of scrutiny in order here? Would the CTIA
phone". They point out that the study was tohold a different position if they were liable, in part,
discover if a person using a mobile phone improvesfor distracted vehicle accidents?Source: Leading
driving if he or she uses a headset. Stephen Wilcox,Universities & Independent ResearchersWhile there
Ph.D., Principal of Design Science (independentare a number of valuable studies on this subject, the
research firm) states, "Driving with both hands on thefollowing are extensive research projects provided
wheel is the safest option for motorists who useby highly accredited organizations:1) Virginia Tech
mobile phones, and headsets are tools to enable thatTransportation Institute researchers and the National
improvement." Considering the source, is thisHighway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
statement characteristic of scientific research? Is ittracked 100 cars and their drivers for a year; they
objective and free of marketing bias? Could itdiscovered that talking on cell phones caused more
confuse individuals into thinking that cell phones arecrashes, near-crashes and other incidents than other
safe as long as you are hands-free? Additionally,distractions (100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, April
found toward the end of the press release, is a2006).2) University of Utah researchers determined
comment by a senior director of product marketing.that motorists on the blood-alcohol threshold of being
Beth Johnson states, "It's important to keep in mindlegally drunk were able to drive better than sober cell
that our study is not intended to address the issuephone using drivers. A key researcher and author in
of whether or not it is safe to talk on a mobilethis field, Psychology Professor David Strayer notes,
phone while driving, but rather what type of"Just like you put yourself and other people at risk
technology is safest for drivers to use while talkingwhen you drive drunk, you put yourself and others
on their mobile phones". They also state their intent isat risk when you use a cell phone and drive. The level
to "educate drivers on options for using mobileof impairment is very similar." Also, consider they
phones comfortably and responsibly while driving".found motorists to be more accident-prone and
Given that the goal is safety education, is thisslower to react when talking on cellular telephones. It
research responsibly comprehensive to consider it adid not matter if it was hands-free either because of
relevant and reliable source?Surely, as you go about"inattention blindness", a syndrome that makes a
your own assessment the idea of freeing up bothdriver less able to process visual information.3) The
hands to control the steering wheel is a logicalGeorge Institute for International Health (University
consideration. If a driver focuses exclusively onof Sydney, Australia), Insurance Institute for Highway
driving the vehicle, then two hands on the wheel isSafety (Arlington, Virginia) and Injury Research
better than one. Unfortunately, this seeminglyCentre, University of Western Australia (Crawley
sensible approach can lead to a false sense of driverAustralia) jointly presented research entitled "Role of
security (possibly increasing crash risk) as noted inmobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in
various reports ( by the Crash Investigation Team athospital attendance: a case-crossover study". The
Virginia Commonwealth University Center for Publicresearch consisted of 456 drivers aged 17 years who
Safety. Their findings illustrated that the cognitiveowned or used mobile phones and had been involved
resources required to carry on a phone conversationin road crashes requiring hospital attendance between
are equivalent to those necessary to drive. This is anApril 2002 and July 2004. They concluded that a
important concern given VCU's history ofdriver who uses a mobile phone (up to 10 minutes
transportation safety research, as well as otherprior to a crash) has a four times higher likelihood of
studies concluding this behavior (carrying on a phonecrashing and an increased likelihood of a crash
conversation while driving), reduces both driverresulting in injury. Using a hands-free phone is not any
reaction time and driver attentiveness, especially assafer.Eliminate the Risk & Keep the BenefitsIf you
they relate to braking.Unlike a computer, humansare the head of a household, a guardian or the
have a limited capacity to process simultaneousparent of a less experienced driver, your decision to
information. If the software on your computerallow any in-vehicle cell phone use carries a major
seems to slow down, you might consider increasingemotional and financial risk. If you are a fleet
the memory or processor speed to compensate formanager or you employ individuals that conduct
delays resulting from an overload in computingwork-related conversations while driving, the risk of
capacity. We as humans have a similar limitation whenliability for distracted accidents could fall on you.
it comes to processing too much information, butStrongly consider the legal ramifications for the
unlike computers, our resources are somewhat fixed.careless operation of an employee-owned or
Given the inherent delays in our own thoughtcompany-supplied vehicle before deciding to ignore
response time when faced with increased loadthe inherent danger created by a major cognitive
factors, is it practical or safe to hold a cell phonedistraction such as a cell phone.Obviously, there are
conversation while driving a motor vehicle?Source:no easy or certain solutions without sacrifice of
Government Transportation Safety ResearchThe USconvenience. Remember that the benefit of having a
government employs many of the top transportationcell phone (emergency use and times when you are
safety experts and funds a major portion of thenot operating a vehicle) is not lost just because it
world's accident prevention research. Given theremains off while driving. If you consider the facts
effects traffic accidents and related congestion havepresented by relevant and reliable sources, it really is
on US productivity, accident reduction is a topnot a matter of a trade off after all, but an
priority. Considering that distracted driving accountedopportunity to prevent an accident or possibly a
for at least 6.4 percent of crash fatalities in 2004fatality. In the mean time, until it is proven otherwise,
(U.S. Department of Transportation), manythink about instigating a life saving strategy NOW for
researchers are looking closely at the distinguishingthe safe use of cell phones - limit yourself, loved
distraction caused by cell phone use in vehicles.ones and employees to use (personal and business)
Furthermore, of the many potential distractions in aonly when the vehicle is in park!Gary S. Rothstein is
vehicle, cell phones are considered equally or morethe President of Mobile Awareness, a company which
dangerous than the other known distractions such asdesigns and markets vehicle safety products.
eating, reading a map or grooming while operating a