Pro-Life Catholic Obstetrics and Gynecology

Pro-Life or Catholic patients often getbefore and during pregnancy may have long lasting
recommendations which conflict with their beliefs.benefits for children.
Hope has arrived.Female Disorders without the Pill Many female
Maternal Disorders Abortion for maternal disordersdisorders, such as painful periods, irregular cycles,
was obsolete by the early 1950's. A study byexcessive bleeding, ovarian cysts, acne,
Cosgrove and Carter[1] in 1944 reported on 67,000endometriosis, premenstrual syndrome, etc. are
deliveries from 1931 to 1943 at the Margaret Haguetreated with birth control pills. These can now be
Maternity Hospital in Jersey City. Only 4 of 67,000treated without the pill, using methods based on
were thought to require abortion for maternalnatural family planning[5]. Many women have anger,
indication. Cosgrove delivered a subsequent 70,000depression, irritability, headaches, breast soreness and
babies with no 'therapeutic' or maternally indicatedmany other problems in the week before their
abortions.menstrual periods (PMS). Understanding the female
In 1953 Hefferman and Lynch[2] conducted a postalcycle through natural family planning, and correcting
survey of maternal deaths at hospitals, which did orthe problems which are revealed, is a rewarding
did not permit abortion for maternal indication. Theapproach that respects life and improves marriage.
death rates were not biased by referral patterns: theThe natural family planning approach is so novel, that
same diagnoses occurred in the same proportions init even leads to a new approach to menopausal care.
both groups. At hospitals that did not permitPro-Life Fertility Care Many Catholics do not realize
abortions, there were 1,469 deaths and 1,680,989that assisted reproduction techniques are considered
deliveries, for a maternal death rate of 0.87 per 1000.immoral in the Catholic Church. One patient was
At hospitals that did permit abortions, there wereshocked to find, after the birth of her twins, that she
1,558 maternal deaths and 1,574,717 deliveries,had 24 more human embryos stored in a freezer.
yielding a maternal death rate of 0.98 per 1000.She said, "I can't have 24 more children!" Another
Maternal death was lower (0.87/1000) at institutionspatient said that as a pre-requisite to in-vitro
that did not allow abortions, than at those (0.98fertilization, she had to sign an agreement promising
1000) that did. These studies make a stronger caseto undergo fetal reduction (abortion) if too many
since they date from the 1950's. Even the mostembryos implanted (she complied). These examples
difficult situations can now be managed withoutillustrate a few of the many reasons why in-vitro
abortion.fertilization and most assisted reproduction
Fetal Disorders and Preconception Care Abortion fortechnologies should be avoided by faithful pro-life or
fetal indication often causes spiritual, psychological andCatholic couples.
or physical harm to the mother, and death to theNew methods make ethical fertility treatments
baby[3]. Having a baby die is a profound andavailable for Catholic or pro-life men and women[6].
unforgettable tragedy for a mother. To add abortionOne couple had been infertile for 19 years, but
may make a bad situation worse. Some of mysucceeded with faith, prayer, and surgery.
patients have had babies with lethal birth defects.References 1. Baggot, P.J., Diagnosis and treatment
Delivery at term, with supportive family inof infertility using natural family planning. Rethinking
attendance, and holding and loving the baby until itreproductive medicine. 2001: One More Soul. 2.
dies naturally in its mother arms, can be an incrediblyBaggot, P.J., Hard cases do not justify partial birth
positive and healing experience[4]. An unforgettablyabortion. Unpublished Manuscript, 2002. 3. Baggot, P.J.,
tragic experience is then forever linked with anLittle David. Focus on the Family, 2003. 4. Cosgrove,
unforgettably loving and healing event.S.A. and P.A. Carter, A consideration of therapeutic
New methods allow the prevention of birth defectsabortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1944. 48: p. 299. 5.
and miscarriage before conception. These methodsHefferman, R.J. and W.A. Lynch, What is the status
are consistent with pro-life fertility treatments andof therapeutic abortion in modern obstetrics? Am J
natural family planning. Natural family planning chartsObstet Gynecol, 1953. 66: p. 335. 6. Hilgers, T.W., The
may indicate the likelihood for miscarriage before itmedical applications of natural family planning. 1991,
happens. Improving nutrition and removing toxinsOmaha, NE: Pope Paul VI Institute Press.