American Hospitals Kill 100,000 A Year

If you've ever had the sneaking suspicion hospitalsdrug-resistant infections. Hospitals are perfect
aren't doing all they can to prevent infections, youenvironments for these super bugs to develop --
may be right. According to three studies published indecreased immune systems, open surgical wounds,
the American Journal of Medical Quality, mostplenty of victims in close proximity, and a plethora of
hospital-acquired, or nosocomial infections, arise as aantibiotics in which to mutate in response. The most
result of hospital procedures, not from the level ofprominent one of them, methicillin-resistant
patients' illness. Inadequate hand-washing andstaphylococcus aureus (MRSA), accounts for 63% of
insufficient donning of sterile clothing by busyhospital staphylococcus infections, up from 22% in
healthcare workers are believed to be major1998. That's a dramatic jump in less than ten years.
contributing factors.MRSA can be asymptomatic, making it difficult to
The Veterans Affairs hospital in Pittsburgh, PArecognize and, once recognized, difficult to treat.
thought more could be done and began anSimple screenings would identify most cases of
experimental program six years ago, utilizing simpleMRSA, but only one-quarter of hospitals
sanitation and isolation techniques to cut the infectionmethodologically screen for bacterial colonies. Terri
rate by 78% in their surgical care unit. The plan wasGerigk Wolf, director of the Veterans Affairs
simple and cost-effective, slashing hospital expensesPittsburgh Healthcare Systems, believes a certain
by $900,000 overall.element of denial is in place. "People don't believe it's
Richard P. Shannon, who headed a similar program atin their institution, and that if it is, that it's too big to
Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to reduce thedo anything about. But we have shown you can do
number of catheter infections, concurs. Shannonsomething about it."
showed that the average infection cost the hospitalState legislatures other than Texas' are also stepping
$27,000, and that health insurance reimbursementsin. Eighteen states now require hospitals to publish
for weeks of treatment could not keep pace withinfection rates; New Jersey and Illinois are the first to
actual expenses. Basic hand sanitation was a majorrequire hospitals to test all intensive-care patients for
emphasis of his program.MRSA. In Pennsylvania, Governor Edward G. Rendell
Such programs could be crucial for Texas healthcaresigned a bill requiring MRSA screening of certain
systems, a state that is already overburdened withhigh-risk patients, though he did not win efforts to
less-than-adequate numbers of qualified physicians, atest all patients for drug-resistant infections.
flood of rural residents rushing to the larger cities ofCritics, such as Dr. John A. Jernigan, question the
Dallas, Austin, and Houston to seek care otherwisenecessity of such programs, believing improving
unavailable or inaccessible to the uninsured, and 25%hygienic and surgical practices alone may yield similar
of its population going without any kind of healthresults. It's "a legitimate scientific debate," said
insurance whatsoever. Lawmakers in Texas areJernigan, about whether hospitals should take the
already pushing for change, and in May, the statetime and expense of screening every patient. Other
House passed Bill SB288, requiring hospitals in Texascritics wonder if isolating infected patients will result in
to publicly disclose certain infection rates developedlower quality care. Statistically, patients in isolation are
by patients in the course of treatment.seen half as often, and suffer more falls, bed sores,
Veterans Affairs' methods are rudimentary enough:and stress. Understaffed hospitals may also be an
test all incoming patients for drug-resistant bacterialissue; blaming healthcare workers who are already
infections and isolate those with positive results,overburdened, while simple enough, might not be a
being sure healthcare workers don sterile gloves andreal solution. Hiring more staff, so that workers have
gowns before entering those areas; equip everymore time to do all "the little things" that make such
room with separate stethoscopes, and every rooma difference, could have dramatic results.
and corridor with hand sanitizer dispensers; discardThe American Hospital Association recommends
blood pressure cuffs after each use. Total cost oftrying methods other than universal screening, and
the program? Around $500,000 per year, includingtesting all incoming patients only when those methods
test kits, salaries for three workers, and theare unsuccessful. But, to the former lieutenant
$175-per-patient expense of gloves, gowns, and handgovernor of New York, Betsy McCaughey, that is
sanitizer. The program was so successful that thesimply unacceptable. The agency "is largely to blame,"
hospital began phasing it in at each of their 140she said for failure to contain these infections. "their
acute-care centers in March, and several Europeanlax guidelines have given hospitals an excuse to do
countries have all but eliminated certain resistanttoo little."
infections through similar regimens.Sad, but perhaps true, is an age-old adage: "An ounce
The Centers for Disease Control projected that 1.7of prevention is worth a pound of cure." In other
million patients in this country will contract awords, try not getting sick so you won't end up
hospital-acquired infection this year, and that tens ofgetting even sicker.
billions of dollars will be spent treating them.Being aware of the current state of healthcare
Ninety-nine thousand will die from these infections,reform is an important aspect of taking care of
killing seven times as many people as HIV, and moreyourself, but so is watching out for your health on an
than diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. Tragically,everyday basis. How you take care of yourself will
many of these fatal infections will result fromcertainly affect you as you age, and eventually your
relatively routine procedures.wallet, as well.
The primary problem is not just infections, but rather